Bitcoin’s recent dip below $92,000 amid Trump’s renewed trade war announcements has sparked concerns among investors about the sustainability of the current bull market. However, historical data and strong demand fundamentals...
Bitcoin’s recent dip below $92,000 amid Trump’s renewed trade war announcements has sparked concerns among investors about the sustainability of the current bull market. However, historical data and strong demand fundamentals suggest that Bitcoin still has room to run.
Trade wars often lead to heightened economic uncertainty, prompting investors to seek alternative stores of value. While Bitcoin’s price reacted negatively to the initial news, many analysts argue that the long-term trajectory remains bullish. According to market projections, Bitcoin’s peak for this cycle is expected to fall between $160,000 and $210,000, with the top anticipated around September–October 2025.
Key on-chain metrics support the bullish outlook. Long-term holder supply remains at historically high levels, indicating confidence among seasoned investors. Additionally, the Pi Cycle Top indicator—a widely followed metric for timing market peaks—has yet to flash a sell signal. Institutional accumulation also remains strong, reinforcing the argument that Bitcoin has not yet reached its final cycle high.
Despite short-term volatility driven by geopolitical tensions, macroeconomic trends, including continued fiat currency debasement and increasing regulatory clarity in the crypto space, suggest that Bitcoin’s long-term trajectory remains intact. While Trump’s trade policies may introduce turbulence, the broader structural factors driving Bitcoin adoption continue to support higher valuations in the coming months.
The SEC launched a new Crypto Task Force website to “provide clarity” for crypto laws. Most of cryptocurrencies such as memecoins and NFTs are now classified as “collectibles” instead of securities.
China has announced a series of new trade measures targeting key U.S. industries, escalating economic tensions between the two nations. As part of these measures, China will impose a 15% tariff...
China has announced a series of new trade measures targeting key U.S. industries, escalating economic tensions between the two nations. As part of these measures, China will impose a 15% tariff on U.S. coal and liquefied natural gas (LNG), sectors that are vital to American energy exports. Additionally, a 10% tariff will be applied to U.S. oil and agricultural machinery, further impacting major industries that contribute significantly to the U.S. economy.
They also announced an antitrust investigation into Google, signaling a broader crackdown on foreign technology firms amid rising tensions with the United States. The probe, launched by China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), will examine whether Google has engaged in monopolistic practices that unfairly restrict competition in the Chinese market.
While Google’s core search engine is already blocked in China due to the country’s strict internet regulations, the company still has business ties within the region, particularly through Android, its mobile operating system, and advertising services. Chinese regulators are expected to scrutinize Google’s dominance in these areas, including potential restrictions placed on local smartphone manufacturers that use Android, Google Play Store policies, and the company’s control over digital advertising revenues.
This investigation aligns with China’s broader efforts to regulate Big Tech and assert greater control over digital markets. It also comes at a time of heightened U.S.-China trade disputes, raising concerns that this move could be politically motivated, serving as retaliation for U.S. restrictions on Chinese tech firms such as Huawei and TikTok.
If China finds Google in violation of antitrust laws, the company could face hefty fines, operational restrictions, or even a forced restructuring of its business within China. Such a decision could have global implications, influencing how other nations approach regulation of dominant U.S. tech firms and further fragmenting the international technology landscape.
New Findings Strengthen the Lab-Leak Hypothesis A recent investigation by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW) has uncovered new evidence linking U.S. government funding to Ben Hu, the Wuhan Institute of...
A recent investigation by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW) has uncovered new evidence linking U.S. government funding to Ben Hu, the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researcher now identified as “Patient Zero”—the first known person to fall ill with COVID-19.
Newly-leaked U.S. intelligence, combined with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) investigation led by WCW, suggests that Hu and his colleagues at the Wuhan Lab were working on dangerous gain-of-function research on coronaviruses—experiments that were partially funded by American taxpayers through grants from the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
Connecting the Dots: U.S. Tax Dollars and Wuhan’s Risky Research
Since 2019, WCW has followed the money trail leading to China’s Wuhan Lab, exposing how U.S. taxpayer funds were funneled into reckless animal experiments. In 2021, a FOIA lawsuit filed by WCW revealed official receipts proving that the U.S. government was funding Ben Hu’s gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses.
Now, a newly-leaked U.S. intelligence report identifies Hu as the first known individual to contract COVID-19 at the Wuhan Lab—further solidifying the lab-leak theory.
What Do the Documents Reveal?
Ben Hu, now confirmed as “Patient Zero,” was the lead scientist conducting high-risk gain-of-function experiments on coronaviruses at the Wuhan Lab.
The U.S. government allocated over $41 million in taxpayer funds to the lab through NIAID and USAID grants.
Federal accounting records confirm that Hu was a primary recipient of these grants, despite U.S. policies restricting gain-of-function research.
In November 2019, Hu and two other Wuhan researchers—Yu Ping and Yan Zhu—became severely ill with COVID-like symptoms, months before China publicly acknowledged the outbreak.
Reports indicate that one Wuhan researcher’s wife died in December 2019 from a mysterious respiratory illness resembling COVID-19.
Without WCW’s investigation, Hu’s research would have continued receiving U.S. taxpayer funding until 2024. However, due to public pressure and congressional scrutiny, WCW helped terminate these grants in early 2020.
Why This Matters: A Cover-Up Exposed
The revelations expose a disturbing chain of events:
U.S. tax dollars funded Wuhan Lab researchers, including Hu, to conduct high-risk experiments on bat coronaviruses.
Ben Hu and his colleagues became sick with a COVID-like illness in late 2019, months before the official outbreak was reported.
Their identities and medical histories were kept secret by both the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and U.S. authorities.
Leaked intelligence and FOIA documents now confirm their involvement in taxpayer-funded gain-of-function experiments.
A Growing Consensus on the Lab-Leak Theory
For years, government agencies and media outlets dismissed the lab-leak theory as a conspiracy. However, scientific experts, intelligence agencies, and most Americans now recognize that COVID-19 likely originated from a Wuhan laboratory accident.
Even the U.S. State Department acknowledged in January 2021 that Wuhan researchers involved in coronavirus experiments were hospitalized in late 2019 with symptoms resembling COVID-19.
With the latest intelligence confirming their identities and funding sources, the pieces of the puzzle are coming together.
What Happens Next?
Next week, the Biden Administration is expected to declassify additional intelligence on COVID-19’s origins. Meanwhile, WCW continues to work with lawmakers, including Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS), to ensure that U.S. tax dollars never again fund dangerous gain-of-function research—especially in foreign labs with questionable safety practices.
The Fight to End Wasteful and Dangerous Research
WCW is committed to exposing reckless government spending on risky animal experiments. From investigating Dr. Fauci’s controversial Beagle experiments (#BeagleGate) to tracking U.S. taxpayer funding of the Wuhan Lab’s coronavirus research, WCW is leading the charge to defund wasteful and dangerous government projects.
Take Action
At TheParrotPress we have made available below the full FOIA documents obtained by WCW.
Urge lawmakers to ban taxpayer funding for gain-of-function research.
In a surprising and bold move, the President of El Salvador has extended an offer to the United States: outsource a portion of its prison system to El Salvador in exchange...
In a surprising and bold move, the President of El Salvador has extended an offer to the United States: outsource a portion of its prison system to El Salvador in exchange for a fee. The proposal suggests that El Salvador’s state-of-the-art Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT)—one of the world’s largest and most secure mega-prisons—could house convicted criminals from the U.S., including U.S. citizens, at a significantly lower cost than maintaining them in American prisons.
El Salvador PrisonEl Salvador PrisonEl Salvador PrisonEl Salvador Prison
A Cost-Effective Solution for the U.S.
The United States has long struggled with overcrowding, high costs, and inefficiencies in its prison system. As of recent estimates, the U.S. spends tens of thousands of dollars per inmate annually, creating a heavy financial burden on federal and state governments. El Salvador’s offer presents a potential alternative—transferring convicted criminals to CECOT for a fee that would be relatively low for the U.S. but financially impactful for El Salvador.
What Makes El Salvador’s Mega-Prison Unique?
CECOT, which was inaugurated in 2023, has gained international attention for its high-security measures, strict conditions, and capacity to hold up to 40,000 inmates. Built primarily to house gang members and organized crime offenders, the facility boasts cutting-edge surveillance systems, around-the-clock security, and extreme measures to prevent escape or internal violence.
By leveraging this infrastructure, El Salvador hopes to generate revenue while maintaining the sustainability of its prison system, which has expanded dramatically due to the country’s aggressive crackdown on crime.
Potential Controversies and Legal Hurdles
While the proposal may appear beneficial from a financial standpoint, it raises significant legal, ethical, and political concerns. Would the U.S. Constitution allow for American citizens to serve their sentences in foreign prisons? How would human rights organizations react, given past criticisms of El Salvador’s harsh prison conditions? And would there be bipartisan political support for outsourcing a core part of the American criminal justice system?
Moreover, prisoner rehabilitation and reintegration efforts in the U.S. differ significantly from El Salvador’s punitive, high-discipline approach, leading to concerns about whether inmates would receive fair treatment and access to rehabilitation programs.
A Precedent for International Prison Outsourcing?
Although this idea may seem radical, prison outsourcing is not unprecedented. Countries such as Norway have previously rented prison space from the Netherlands, and the U.S. itself has used private prisons and even immigration detention outsourcing. However, outsourcing to a foreign nation with a vastly different judicial and correctional system would be uncharted territory for the U.S.
What Comes Next?
It remains to be seen whether the U.S. government will formally consider or respond to this proposal. If accepted, it could mark a historic shift in international prison management—one with profound implications for both nations.
For now, El Salvador has made its offer clear: it is willing to take in convicted criminals from the United States in exchange for a fee that could help sustain its own correctional system. Whether Washington will entertain this proposal or dismiss it as an impractical and controversial idea remains to be seen.
Would you support outsourcing U.S. inmates to El Salvador? Let us know your thoughts.
In an unprecedented move, Elon Musk has handpicked a team of 22-year-old, highly skilled, and incredibly focused autistic engineers to lead a radical transformation of the federal government’s bureaucracy. At the...
In an unprecedented move, Elon Musk has handpicked a team of 22-year-old, highly skilled, and incredibly focused autistic engineers to lead a radical transformation of the federal government’s bureaucracy. At the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), these young minds are rewriting the rules, driving efficiency in an area traditionally resistant to innovation. Their mission? To break down the layers of inefficiency that have long plagued the federal system and force accountability at the highest levels.
This isn’t your average government initiative. These engineers, most of whom have been diagnosed with autism, possess an extraordinary level of cognitive ability—capable of hyperfocus, pattern recognition, and problem-solving on a scale that seems almost otherworldly. While most of their peers are still finding their way in the workforce, these young professionals have already made an indelible mark on one of the most complex bureaucratic institutions in the world.
The task at hand is daunting: to streamline government operations, review outdated processes, and challenge entrenched systems. But Musk’s decision to place these 22-year-olds at the forefront of reform has paid off in ways no one expected. They’ve allegedly forced high-level General Services Administration (GSA) employees to not only justify their roles but meticulously review the code they’ve written, essentially subjecting decades-old processes to rigorous, data-driven scrutiny.
Despite their youth, the impact of their work is palpable. “They’re not just optimizing systems—they’re completely dismantling them and rebuilding them in real time,” said one anonymous government insider. “While older bureaucrats are tied up in red tape and internal politics, this group has no time for that. They go straight to the core of the problem and fix it, no questions asked.”
Their methods, while effective, are unconventional. These engineers aren’t satisfied with small improvements; they aim to revolutionize entire sectors of government, applying the kind of efficiency-driven mindset typically reserved for Silicon Valley startups, not federal agencies. They scrutinize every line of code, every process, every expenditure, ensuring that nothing is left unchecked.
“They think in terms of maximum efficiency. If there’s a bottleneck, they’ll find it, and they’ll fix it—no matter how many decades that bottleneck has been in place,” one insider said.
What makes their approach even more remarkable is their background. Many in the team have been diagnosed with autism, a condition that often leads to enhanced focus, meticulous attention to detail, and an ability to identify patterns others might overlook. These traits have made them uniquely suited for the task at hand—transforming a bureaucracy that’s often slow to adapt to the demands of the modern world.
“Their attention to detail is unreal,” said a former government contractor. “They can spot inefficiencies in a mountain of paperwork that would take others weeks to even notice. It’s like they’re able to see the matrix.”
But the team’s unorthodox methods have raised eyebrows within traditional government circles. GSA employees who once coasted on decades-old systems are now being forced to justify their existence, all while these young engineers ruthlessly cut through the red tape. It’s a power shift that has rattled the core of the federal bureaucracy, and many are left wondering how long it can last.
Under Musk’s leadership, this 22-year-old team is showing the world what happens when unbridled talent meets government inefficiency—and they’re proving that age doesn’t matter when you’re out to change the system.
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is reportedly being led by Elon Musk and a team of highly skilled yet inexperienced 20-year-old autistic engineers, according to Wired. Under Musk’s leadership, these...
The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is reportedly being led by Elon Musk and a team of highly skilled yet inexperienced 20-year-old autistic engineers, according to Wired. Under Musk’s leadership, these young programmers are radically disrupting the federal bureaucracy, allegedly forcing high-level General Services Administration (GSA) employees to justify their work by meticulously reviewing the code they’ve written.
Despite their limited professional backgrounds, these individuals have been granted A-suite level clearance, a designation typically reserved for top government officials and executives. In a striking example of their rapid ascent, one of these engineers is said to have only recently graduated high school. Their presence signals a dramatic shift in how government operations are being evaluated, with technical efficiency and software development taking precedence over tenure or experience in the agency.
Musk, known for his aggressive approach to efficiency and automation, has reportedly given these engineers broad authority to cut through bureaucratic inefficiencies, challenging long-standing norms within the government. The stark contrast between these young technocrats and long-serving bureaucrats has created an unprecedented dynamic. Imagine spending three decades navigating government procedures, building a career in federal administration, only to find yourself answering to—or even being dismissed by—a 17-year-old autistic coder wielding nothing but a laptop and technical expertise.
You might ask—how efficient is this team? In less than a week, Musk’s efficiency team successfully terminated 22 government leases, relocating agencies from underutilized “ghost buildings” into existing office space. The result? An impressive $44.6 million in taxpayer savings—up from just $1.6 million a few days prior. And the numbers continue to improve at a dramatic pace, with the total savings up to 1B!
Musk’s involvement has only added to the controversy surrounding DOGE, raising questions about the future of traditional public sector roles, the role of automation in government oversight, and whether this Silicon Valley-inspired approach can truly deliver on the promise of a leaner, more effective administration. Some see it as a much-needed shake-up, while others fear it could lead to chaos and instability in essential government functions.
The Battle for Dollar Dominance: A Response to BRICS Currency Ambitions In recent times, discussions about the dominance of the U.S. dollar in global trade have gained momentum. A particular focus...
The Battle for Dollar Dominance: A Response to BRICS Currency Ambitions
In recent times, discussions about the dominance of the U.S. dollar in global trade have gained momentum. A particular focus has been on the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) exploring alternatives to reduce their reliance on the dollar. This potential shift has raised concerns among global economic stakeholders and policymakers in the United States.
Former President Donald J. Trump recently addressed these concerns with a strong stance against the possibility of the BRICS countries introducing a new currency to challenge the dollar’s hegemony. He proposed imposing severe economic measures, such as 100% tariffs, on nations that attempt to undermine the dollar’s dominance in international trade.
The Significance of the U.S. Dollar in Global Trade
The U.S. dollar has been the world’s reserve currency since the Bretton Woods Agreement of 1944. Its stability, backed by the strength of the U.S. economy, has made it the currency of choice for international trade, investments, and central bank reserves. A shift away from the dollar could disrupt global trade dynamics, weaken the influence of the United States in the global economy, and increase currency volatility.
Why BRICS is Exploring an Alternative
The BRICS nations, collectively representing a significant portion of global GDP, have been vocal about reducing dependency on the dollar. The motivation stems from several factors:
Geopolitical Tensions: Sanctions imposed on countries like Russia have highlighted the risks of over-reliance on a single currency controlled by one nation.
Economic Sovereignty: Emerging economies want greater control over their monetary policies without being influenced by the Federal Reserve’s actions.
Trade Efficiency: By trading in a shared currency or local currencies, BRICS nations aim to reduce transaction costs and currency risks.
Trump’s Vision: Tariffs and Protectionism
Trump’s statement reflects a protectionist approach aimed at safeguarding the U.S. economy. By threatening tariffs and economic consequences, he seeks to deter countries from collaborating on initiatives that could weaken the dollar. The key elements of his proposal include:
100% Tariffs: A significant economic penalty for countries attempting to bypass the dollar.
Economic Isolation: Restricting access to the U.S. market, which remains one of the largest consumer markets in the world.
Maintaining Influence: Ensuring that the dollar remains the cornerstone of international trade and finance.
The Challenges Ahead
While the BRICS nations may aspire to introduce a new currency, several challenges stand in their way:
Economic Divergence: The BRICS countries have vastly different economic structures, growth rates, and monetary policies.
Trust and Stability: A new currency would need to gain the trust of global markets, which requires years of economic and political stability.
Dollar Dependency: Even within BRICS, much of their trade and reserves are still dollar-based, making a transition difficult.
The idea of moving away from the U.S. dollar is not new, but implementing it is a monumental task. As global trade continues to evolve, the U.S. must address the concerns of emerging economies while maintaining the dollar’s appeal. Trump’s strong rhetoric underscores the importance of the dollar to U.S. economic power, but a cooperative approach may be needed to navigate these complex global dynamics.
The world is watching closely as the BRICS nations deliberate their next steps. Whether they succeed in challenging the dollar or not, one thing is certain: the conversation about global monetary systems is far from over.
Sen. Lummis has been appointed Chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets and is pushing for bipartisan legislation to establish a legal framework for digital assets and strengthen the...
Sen. Lummis has been appointed Chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets and is pushing for bipartisan legislation to establish a legal framework for digital assets and strengthen the U.S. dollar with a strategic Bitcoin reserve.
@SenLummis is calling for the U.S. to secure Bitcoin as a strategic asset, warning: “If you’re not first, you’re last.” She argues that leading in Bitcoin adoption is essential for America’s dominance in the 21st-century financial system.
Is the U.S. finally ready to embrace BTC at a national level?
The Senator stated in her X account: “Digital assets are the future, and if the United States wants to remain a global leader in financial innovation, Congress needs to urgently pass bipartisan legislation establishing a comprehensive legal framework for digital assets and that strengthens the U.S. dollar with a strategic bitcoin reserve. I am humbled my colleagues have placed their trust in me to chair this historic subcommittee and I look forward to shepherding bipartisan legislation to President Trump’s desk this year that secures our financial future.”